Review: Chalice of Liberty: Protecting Religious Freedom in Australia

Chalice of Liberty: Protecting Religious Freedom in AustraliaChalice of Liberty: Protecting Religious Freedom in Australia by Frank Brennan
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

In the climate of Australian public discourse at the moment, and in light of recent developments that have had or will have significant consequences for religious freedom in Australia, this volume is a timely contribution.

Essentially consisting of two essays – one by Frank Brennan and Michael Casey on the importance of religious freedom for the well being of a secular democracy like Australia, and the other by Greg Craven looking at the legal protection of religious freedom in Australia – this book sets out very clearly the nature and necessity of everyone – religious, agnostic or atheist – ensuring the religious freedom, and its protection, continue to be a topic of interest and discussion in Australia.

Some of the comments in both essays might surprise those who think they know what religious freedom is (hint: they may not), and the ten principles of religious freedom contained in the first essay are worthy of reflection and consideration by every Australian, regardless of their religious affiliation. Couched very clearly in terms of human dignity and human rights, the arguments put forward in these essays are not easily dismissed – or are dismissed to the detriment of the broader society.

As you would expect from writers of the calibre of Brennan, Casey and Craven, this book is both easily accessible yet intellectually rigorous. A must-read for anyone who believes that human dignity and human flourishing is something to be sort by everyone for the sake of society.

View all my reviews

Review: The King’s Justice

The King's Justice (Stanton & Barling, #1)The King’s Justice by E.M. Powell
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

An enjoyable read, a wonderful mystery, and the development of an interesting partnership – though I wouldn’t particularly want to live in the village to which Stanton and Barling are sent. Originally despatched to investigate and deliver justice in connection with one secret murder, our heroes Stanton and Barling find themselves faced with four more in short order, and despite neither of them wishing to be there – let alone together – the pair of King’s men manage to both survive and get to the bottom of the intrigue.

Faithful to the historical period in which it is set, this work of fiction provides the reader with a glimpse into the times of King Henry II, particularly in terms of his legal reforms, while drawing them deeper into the intrigue that surrounds the village and the murders that take place therein.

Well researched and well written, this novel comes highly recommended.

View all my reviews

Ten Principles of Religious Freedom

I am currently reading a book entitled Chalice of Liberty: Protecting Religious Freedom in Australia, which is essentially two essays, the first written by Frank Brennan and Michael Casey.

Towards the end of that first essay, Brennan and Casey enumerate ten principles of religious freedom (pp. 49-53), which in the current public discourse are worthy of being presented in their unadulterated form:

1. Freedom of religion and belief is a universal human right

Religious freedom belongs to every person, because most people look for answers to questions of meaning and value in something greater than themselves. Many religious people look to God, but non-religious people also draw on ultimate sources of meaning which are not of their making, such as ideas about human dignity, justice, freedom, equality, and the environment. In one sense, questions of meaning and value are religious questions even when our answers are atheism or agnosticism.

2. Religious freedom is based on respect for individual freedom

“The act of faith is of its very nature a free act” (Dignitatis humanae §10). Religious freedom is the right to believe or not to believe, to adopt, reject or change beliefs as we decide for ourselves. It protects freedom by protecting people from having the beliefs of others – religious, secular or political – imposed on them. Catholic beliefs too are not to be imposed on anyone, but proposed for people to accept or reject as they decide freely for themselves.

3. Religious freedom protects human dignity

Religious freedom upholds the intrinsic dignity of people who think, believe, worship and live differently. It protects them against pressure to hide their beliefs, or from being forced to censor themselves or limit their participation in society to avoid bullying or intimidation. It defends them from discrimination, exclusion or punishment because of their beliefs. Religious freedom is especially important in protecting people whose beliefs or ideas others find strange, ridiculous or even “offensive”, and particularly communities which may be hated and feared because of their beliefs.

4. Religious freedom should be exercised in solidarity with other people

Like many rights, religious freedom is not an absolute. It is limited by respect for both the rights of others and the common good. Because our sense of autonomy is often stronger than our sense of the common good, agreeing on the limits of rights can be fraught. Tensions between rights should be resolved wherever possible in a spirit of mutual respect, not suspicion, and with generosity towards beliefs and ways of life we do not share or even oppose. Restrictions on religious freedom should be made only on the basis of principles which apply to everyone.

5. Religious freedom is more than freedom of worship or a right to tolerance

The persecution of people in different parts of the world because of their religious beliefs shows how important basic protections such as freedom to worship and the right to be tolerated are, but religious freedom does not end there. It is a much larger freedom which makes it possible for individuals and faith communities to witness to their beliefs with integrity and as full members of their society, not only in worship but in professional life, public life and service to the wider community.

6. Religious freedom allows individuals to practise their religion freely and publicly as citizens, and not just in private life

The claim that religious people should quarantine their beliefs from public debate and even from the way they carry out their profession or occupation is unfair and discriminatory, because it allows everyone except religious people to act on their beliefs. No human being lives in neatly divided public and private worlds. Beliefs about meaning and truth, right and wrong – religious and non-religious alike – are conclusions about what is real and important in life. For everyone, they serve as a basis for their action in the world.

7. Religious freedom means people are entitled to live out their beliefs in the way they serve the rest of the community

Coming together around a common purpose and shared beliefs to help those in need is one of the main ways in which religious communities encourage participation in society and work to build up a sense of solidarity. Religious freedom protects not only the right of people to live out their beliefs in co-operation with others who share their faith, but also the right to establish and operate services for the wider community that are faithful to the beliefs which inspired them, and which are reflected in their work.

8. Religious freedom is not a claim for special treatment

It is a basic fairness for people to be able to put their beliefs into practice and not to be forced to act against them. Religious freedom protects this basic fairness. It is not a claim for a special privilege or an exemption for religious communities from laws which apply to everyone else, and describing it in these terms is misleading. Religious freedom is a fundamental right which ensures there is a space for religious communities to live out their beliefs, while also respecting the dignity and freedom of other people.

9. Religious freedom reinforces other fundamental rights

Religious freedom is part of a larger whole. It does not sit in isolation but is an integrated and essential part of human rights. Because these rights protect the different things we need to make a full life possible, they have to go together and they should not be placed in opposition to each other. Freedom of religion both depends on respect for rights such as freedom of conscience, freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and freedom of assembly, and supports and reinforces them in turn. Placing religious freedom in doubt places these other rights in doubt as well.

10. Religious freedom makes democratic societies stronger

Religious freedom protects not only the right of individuals and religious communities to fully participate in the life of a democratic society, but also the contribution they make to building it up. Because religious freedom and related protections such as conscientious objection protect people from being compelled to co-operate with activities which they hold, as a matter of conviction, to be wrong, they also help to encourage people to speak out against injustice and evil when no one else will. Good societies need these voices.


The book, Chalice of Liberty, is published by The Kapunda Press, an imprint of Connor Court Publishing in association with the PM Glynn Institute. ISBN: 978-1-925501-83-4.

Are You Being Conned?

A very intriguing article in Eureka Street, from Andrew Hamilton, the consulting editor, in which he ‘reviews’ the latest Quarterly Essay contribution from Richard Denniss.

The Quarterly Essay, in which Denniss provides a “cheeky funeral oration for the neoliberal settlement” has clearly appealed to Hamilton, and his ‘review’ makes it abundantly clear exactly why that is the case.

Neoliberal doctrine is useful, however, in enabling governments to reject proposals for expenditure that offer a social benefit, such as providing decent support for the unemployed. They respond by asking, not how we can implement it, but whether we can afford it. The question central to discussion of any policy, namely what kind of society we shall shape by addressing or not addressing the need, is not even discussed. It is dismissed as irrelevant to ‘economics’.

By of distinction, Hamilton argues we need to reaffirm and embrace once more the notion of civilisation – and not Western Civilisation as that phrase has been used in recent times, in the hope of rediscovering something of our fundamental identity:

To address our present discontents we do need a commitment to civilisation: to strengthen the bonds between people, based on a larger and deeper view of human wellbeing that embraces connections and relationships, in which the good of each person and of each group is bound up with the flourishing of all. That will call us to honour and to draw on all the texts and traditions, not simply those defined as western, which encourage the habit of asking what matters most deeply and have generated social structures that embody it.

Poetry, novels, religious texts, plays and films all explore relationships, including those involved in political and public life as well as personal ones. They reveal the poverty of much of our public discourse and prompt deeper reflection on what contributes to a good society. Without the habitual reflection and attentiveness that they demand the dethroning of one cheap and self-interested economic theory will simply be replaced by the coronation of another.

Read the Eureka Street article in full below.

https://www.eurekastreet.com.au/article.aspx?aeid=55968

Review: Fear of Abandonment: Australia in the World since 1942

Fear of Abandonment: Australia in the World since 1942Fear of Abandonment: Australia in the World since 1942 by Allan Gyngell
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

If one truly wishes to understand the nature of contemporary Australia, this is a book that should feature on your reading list.

Bringing together in one volume the history of Australia’s foreign policy, and the development of its foreign policy, Allan Gyngell provides his reader with the ability to see Australia’s current understanding of its place in the world in a broader and much more relevant context. This book, while focussing on foreign policy, has significant implications for Australia’s own domestic understanding, politically and corporately.

Gyngell’s writing style is both engaging and informative and draws the reader into wanting to know the whys and wherefores of Australia’s foreign policy. Breaking the development of that policy into specific eras assists in this process and makes the content easily accessible.

I would highly recommend this book to anyone in Australia who wishes to understand who we are.

View all my reviews

Homilies: The Solemnity of the Nativity of St John the Baptist, Year B

My homily for the Solemnity of the Nativity of St John the Baptist (Year B) as preached during the 5.30pm Saturday evening Mass at Sacred Heart Cathedral, Hamilton. The readings were Isaiah 49:1-6; Acts 13:22-26; Luke 1:57-66, 80.

“The giving of a name also gives an identity. John’s identity before God is found in his name – “God is gracious” – and we too are known by our name before God.”